Iran’s secret Christian revolution: how faith is toppling a regime.
This blog discusses the historical reliability of the Bible, the creation/evolution debate and apologetics in general.
Image courtesy of EHT Collaboration.
Joel Kontinen
Does dark matter exist? Some researchers think that it will not but some are adamant that it will in the central black hole that defines our galaxy.
At the centre of our galaxy lies a supermassive black hole
called Sagittarius A* – but one group of researchers is suggesting it may not
be a black hole at all. The team says that it, and other black holes around its
size, may actually be clumps of dark matter.
Dark
matter, so named because it doesn’t seem to interact with light or regular
matter in any way except gravitationally, makes up about 85 per cent of the
total matter in the universe, but we know very little about it. What we do
know, because of the way galaxies rotate, is that most galaxies are embedded in
a halo of the stuff. “We know it has to be at the outskirts of galaxies, but we
don’t know what happens at the very centre,” says Valentina
Crespi at the National University of La Plata (UNLP) in Argentina.
Source:
Leah
Crane 2026
Heat normally flows from hot to cold. Image courtesy of klyaksun/Shutterstock
Joel Kontinen
A forgotten cup of coffee will gradually cool down as its
heat flows into the cooler surrounding air, but in the quantum realm, it
appears this experience can be turned on its head. As a result, we may need to
update the second law of thermodynamics, a fundamental principle of physics
that states heat energy always flows from hot to cold.
But in the computer world, this could be the contrary.
Dawei Lu at
the Southern University of Science and Technology in China and his colleagues
have seemingly broken this law with a molecule of crotonic acid, which contains
atoms of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. The researchers used the nuclei of four
of its carbon atoms as qubits, which are the basic building blocks of quantum
computers and can store quantum information. When used in computation,
researchers normally control the quantum states of the qubits with.
Source:
Karmela
Padavic-Callaghan 2026
The skull of a 3-year-old female Australopithecus afarensis, dated to 3.3 million years ago, discovered at the site of Dikika in Ethiopia. Image courtesy of Zeresenay Alemseged
Joel Kontinen
Recent fossil finds could mean that "Lucy" wasn't
our direct ancestor, some scientists say. Others strongly disagree.
For a half century, the iconic "Lucy" fossil
species, Australopithecus afarensis, has held the title of being the
most likely direct ancestor of all humans.
Now, a key paper published last month in the journal Nature could overturn that theory entirely, some scientists say. They argue that, given the new evidence, an older species, Australopithecus anamensis, was our direct ancestor, not Lucy.
The proposal has revealed intense disagreements in the
field. Some say A. anamensis is our direct ancestor, others argue
that we don't know which Australopithecus species we descended from,
and still others say the new analysis doesn't shake up the family tree at all.
The new discovery is "not altering our picture of human
evolution in any way, in my opinion," Zeray Alemseged, a paleoanthropologist and professor of
organismal biology University of Chicago who was not involved in the new study
said.
The roots of the debate requires going back a century. In
1925, Raymond Dart announced the discovery of the first known Australopithecus — a
skull dubbed the Taung
Child unearthed in what is now South Africa that dates to around 2.6
million years ago. For the next 50 years, researchers thought that humans
descended directly from the Taung Child's species, Australopithecus
africanus.
But Lucy's discovery in
1974 at the Hadar site in Ethiopia rewrote that picture. The 3.2
million-year-old fossil became the oldest known australopithecine specimen at
the time.
And Darwinian researchers found her species, A.
afarensis, walked
upright on two legs similarly to how humans do today, yet it had a
smaller brain — about the size of a modern-day chimp's. This suggested Lucy's
kind could represent a "halfway"
point in human evolution between the last
common ancestor with chimps and us, making her species a good candidate for
our direct ancestor among the many known hominins, the lineage that encompasses
humans and our closest relatives.
According to evolution, Darwinian evolution, with its millions of years, is the only reason for how we evolved, However,
according to intelligent design, we were not produced that way,
Source:
Sophie Berdugo 2025 Scientists claim 'Lucy' may not be our direct ancestor after all, stoking fierce debate | Live Science December 22
Image courtesy of Simone Rotella
Joel Kontinen
Christine Webb's provocative and moving book The Arrogant
Ape explores our unjustifiable sense of superiority in the living world, laying
out the evidence against it, says Elle Hunt.
Tests of chimps’ intelligence often take place in labs, not
in the wild or in sanctuaries like this one.
In the beginning, God made man in his image, granting him
dominion over every living thing that moves upon the earth.
According to evolution, most people don’t look to the Bible
to understand the world and our place in it, yet this view of humans as
superior to nature and non-human life is sneakily persistent.
The characteristics
said tao distinguish humans and justify our dominance – including
the ability to reason, use tools, feel pain, act morally – aren’t exclusively
human, it seems. Chimps, crows and others show nuanced intelligence, have
complex social bonds and use tools; fish and crustaceans feel pain; bees are cultural beings;
even plants may have senses akin to ours.
But it seems that animals have their traits, which does not
make them humans. They create things that look like they tools for making you
well.
Apes are not the only animals that can make human like tools. For
instance, crows do the same.
Elle Hunt 2025
Comet C/2024 E1 has been photographed as it nears Earth - but even at its closest, it will still be 150 million kilometres away. Image courtesy of Ian Griffin
Joel Kontinen
This beautiful streak of light is comet C/2024 E1 hurtling
through the southern constellation Grus. It was first spotted in 2024 and is
thought to have originated from the Oort cloud, a region of icy rocks at the
edge of the solar system, far beyond Pluto. The comet will make its closest
approach to Earth on 17 February – when it will still be almost 150 million
kilometres away
The Oord cloud is a system that scientist haven’t recognised,
it is thought to hold millions of comets.
Source:
New Scientist 2026
Kanzi the bonobo at the age of 43. Image courtesy of Ape Initiative
Joel Kontinen
Bonobos are our closed relatives and that they share the same
traits that we do.
Kanzi, a bonobo with exceptional language skills, took part in a make-believe tea party that demonstrated cognitive abilities never seen before in non-human primates. A bonobo that took part in a pretend tea party like those acted out by young children has shown that our closest primate relatives have the capacity for make believe.
Kanzi the bonobo (Pan paniscus) was born in the US in 1980
and died at age
44 in March last year. He spent most of his life at the Ape Initiative
in Des Moines, Iowa, where he was renowned for being able to communicate by
pointing at symbols on a board.
In the year before he died, Amalia
Bastos at the University of St Andrews, UK, and her colleagues ran a
series of experiments aiming to understand whether, along with his superior
language skills, Kanzi was also able to engage in what researchers describe as
“secondary representations”. This is the ability to imagine an alternative
reality and, in some situations, share that pretense with another individual –
a skill that humans develop at an early age.
At 2 to 3 years old, children can follow the movement of
imaginary liquid between containers and keep track of where the “tea” is or
isn’t, says Bastos. “That’s exactly the sort of context we presented to Kanzi
to test this ability in a non-human animal.”
In the first stage of the experiment, researchers pretended
to pour non-existent juice into two empty cups before pretending to empty one
of the cups and then asking Kanzi which one he wanted. More than two thirds of
the time, Kanzi chose the cup that hadn’t been emptied and still contained the
pretend juice.
“If Kanzi hadn’t conceived of ‘imaginary juice’ in the cups
throughout the study, he should have picked between the two cups at chance –
after all, they were both empty,” says Bastos.
Then the researchers placed an empty cup and
one containing juice on a table in front of Kanzi. He chose the cup
containing juice more than three quarters of the time. This test was to ensure
the bonobo could differentiate between real and fake juice.
For the third test, the team started by placing a real grape
into one of two cups; Kanzi selected the real grape every time. Then a pretend
grape was placed in each of two cups before one was emptied. Again, in over
two-thirds of attempts, Kanzi correctly chose the cup that still contained a
pretend grape.
Bastos says all of the team’s studies with great apes
are fully voluntary. “The fact that Kanzi stuck around and continued to engage
even in trials where he knew there would be no reinforcement says to me that he
must have at least enjoyed it a little bit.”
Source:
James Woodford 2026 Bonobo's pretend tea party shows capacity for imagination | New Scientist 5 February
A Romanesco broccoli. Image courtesy of Jon Sullivan. Joel Kontinen It is practically impossible to believe that some of the phenomen...