Sunday, 30 January 2011
The Assumed Ape To Man Evolution is a Flimsy Story
Image courtesy of José-Manuel Benito Álvarez, Wikipedia.
First there was a story that lacked evidence. Then there were attempts to fit the evidence into a predetermined framework. The result is not very convincing since Darwinian evolution does not have a mechanism that would lift an ape-like creature to walk on two feet and make him into a man capable of using language fluently.
What do fossils disclose about human evolution? Not very much. Although there is no scarcity of fossils there are very few assumed remains of our supposed forefathers.
In his book Icons of Evolution (2000), Jonathan Wells, who has a PhD in molecular and cell biology, criticised the assumed evidence for evolution. He pointed out that it was very flimsy and misleading.
On a fresh video he says that nothing much has changed in ten years. Darwinian evolution does not work:
Natural selection and mutations do not increase an organism’s genetic information. In other words, animals cannot evolve from simpler forms into more sophisticated ones.