Aaustralopithecus africanus skull, by josé braga; cc by-sa 4.0.
Joel Kontinen
After publishing
in Science, In this press release the senior author of the new study, Sergio Almécija, a senior research scientist at the American Museum
of Natural History, is also quoted as offering this remarkable admission: “When
you look at the narrative for hominin origins, it’s just a big mess — there’s
no consensus whatsoever.”
As Gunthr Bechly
said, That is a fair assessment. It does not mean that these
evolutionary speculations are all wrong or futile enterprises. However, it at
least shows that those bold hardcore Darwinists, who think they can dismiss and
rebuke Darwin critics and ID proponents with some grandiose claims of allegedly
settled science, are not just vastly overstating their case but indeed are
ignorant of the current state of the scientific debate. The question of human
origins is far from being resolved and non-mainstream options should be
explored based exclusively on the available evidence, rather than being rejected
due to world-view bias.
Yes, the Scientific answer to the question
of who was before us is s not fought in the Darwinian era.
Source
Bechly Günter. 2021. Scientists Conclude: HumanOrigins Research Is a Big Mess 10 May.
Posts
